Back to Common Ground Archive



Air Date: February 4, 1997
Program 9705


AMERICANS FOR AFRICA


Guests:

Jennifer Davis, Executive Director,
American Committee on Africa; The Africa Fund

Dumisani Kumalo, Projects Director,
American Committee on Africa; The Africa Fund


(This text has been professionally transcribed. However, for timely

distribution, it has not been edited or proofread against the tape.)

MARY GRAY DAVIDSON, Senior Producer: This is Common Ground.

There’s a myth that Africa is a dark continent of disease, famine and civil war. On this edition
of Common Ground we talk to the leaders of one American organization working to dispel
that myth.

JENNIFER DAVIS, Executive Director, American Committee on Africa; The Africa Fund: We see
Africa as an enormously important continent. It’s linked by history, by the fact that many
Americans come originally from Africa, but it’s also linked by the fact that it’s a sixth or
something of the world’s population. I always think about that picture we saw taken from outer
space of our fragile world. You can’t disconnect people in one part of the world from another part
of the world. We’re all responsible for one another.

DAVIDSON: Common Ground is a program on world affairs and the people who shape
events. It’s produced by the Stanley Foundation. I’m Mary Gray Davidson.

The American Committee on Africa was founded more than four decades ago in the days of colonial
Africa. It was created in 1953 by a group of Americans active in the civil rights struggle here
who saw the need to support the struggle for African freedom and self-determination. Today the
American Committee on Africa is headed by Wyatt T. Walker, former chief of staff to Martin Luther
King, Jr., and senior pastor of the Canaan Baptist Church of Christ in New York’s Harlem
community. While colonialism and white minority rule are gone in Africa, it remains the world’s
poorest and mostly forgotten continent. Jennifer Davis is executive director of the American
Committee on Africa, which says it is working to make sure the U.S. does not write off Africa’s
720 million people.

DAVIS: We are not a developmental organization. We are not a rich organization, so we
can’t send lots of money to Africa. What we try and do is impact on U.S. policy, on critical U.S.
policy.

DAVIDSON: Joining Jennifer Davis is Dumisani Kumalo, Projects Director for the American
Committee on Africa, and its newer Africa Fund. The Africa Fund advisory committee lists such
notable Americans as Coretta Scott King, Julian Bond, Ossie Davis and Ruby Dee. Dumisani Kumalo
uses the campaign to end apartheid in South Africa to show how the two organizations work to
influence U.S. policy toward Africa.

DUMISANI KUMALO, Projects Director, American Committee on Africa; The Africa Fund: What
we did was we tried to educate Americans about apartheid, why apartheid was bad, and what the
issues were in South Africa. We taught them about who Nelson Mandela was, and you know, and the
struggle for liberation in South Africa. But the other thing which we did very well, we showed
Americans that there’s something they could do in their own counties, their own towns, their own
cities, that could help bring about the end of apartheid. And that was divestment, which was the
withdrawal of funds from banks and companies that dealt with South Africa. You know, so Americans
didn’t only know that there was this awful policy called apartheid happening 10,000 miles away,
but they also felt empowered to do something in their own towns and in their own areas. And I
think that was the success of it.

DAVIS: Amazingly enough in the early ’60s, U.S. policy was supportive of apartheid
because it didn’t prevent the enormous flow of resources of funds of money to the apartheid
regime. And so we saw our job as cutting off that flow. And I think we were extremely successful.
It’s been very heartwarming to have people like Nelson Mandela and other leaders, Desmond Tutu,
and grassroots South Africans, say “The sanctions campaign you people did was really
important. It helped us.” We’ve never said, and we’ve never seen ourselves as the prime
movers. We always try and support struggles that are ongoing in Africa. And so now we see our
responsibility as helping people in the second stage of their struggle. They have often won
political independence, even as in South Africa, democracy, but they still have an enormous road
forward in terms of winning economic justice. And now we’re trying to find those linkages.

DAVIDSON: A core program of the Africa Fund to promote democracy abroad links state
legislators from the United States with their counterparts in Africa. Dumisani Kumalo sees this
effort as necessary to sustaining democracy over the long haul.

KUMALO: Well, one of the ways in which we are trying to help with the sustaining of
democracy and development in Africa has been to link local elected officials in this country with
their counterparts in southern Africa. Now we started off with southern Africa for the simple
reason that southern Africa is a much easier area to deal with. You know, it includes South
Africa and about 10 other countries. And we’re moving into other parts of Africa. But always
remembering that, you know, when you deal with Africa you deal with countries that are so
different, and for Americans sometimes it gets complicated because, you know, they now have to
come across countries they never really thought about or knew about. And so what we’ve decided to
do is have this program that links up legislators in the United States and legislators at local
levels in southern Africa so they can help each other in building up their own democracy and
strengthening it.

DAVIS: I’ve just come back from South Africa and people talk a lot about the need for
empowerment, the need for training. And we found that these kind of exchanges between peer groups
are very useful, rather than long formal programs of training. Very often people find in the
exchange of their experience a great deal that assists and empowers them. And that then makes
connections, which can also help us impact on U.S. policy.

DAVIDSON: The American Committee on Africa and the Africa Fund are currently putting
heavy emphasis on Nigeria in western Africa, whose 100 million citizens live under a military
dictatorship. Mashood Abiola, who was elected President in a 1993 election, is currently
imprisoned. His wife was shot and killed last June within yards of a police roadblock.
Internationally known poet and environmentalist Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight of his associates were
executed last year. Jennifer Davis and Dumisani Kumalo of the American Committee on Africa
believe the crisis in Nigeria could be resolved by determined U.S. action.

DAVIS: The problem for Nigeria is that in, although Nigeria has been independent for some
30, over 30 years, it has had a great difficulty in sustaining democracy. And currently is again
under a military dictatorship. And we’ve seen in the same way, as an extension of our work
actually, that it’s our responsibility to help Nigerians as they struggle to reachieve democracy.
Now obviously we face an enormous problem. We are a very small staff, and we have many problems
in Africa. So how do we choose? We try and choose where we think that U.S. policy can have a
really significant impact. And with Nigeria there is a very big economic connection between the
United States and Nigeria, because Nigeria is a primary oil-producing country, and the United
States buys a great deal of Nigerian oil. And it’s the U.S. companies that are responsible for
producing most of that Nigerian oil. So that significant pressure from the U.S. could have a
great effect on Nigeria. So far it’s been very reluctant to use that pressure. We, in a sense we
see this as a new way, a new chance for us to mobilize the American population, in the same way
as they spoke out in support of South African freedom. That they can in fact impact on what
happens inside Nigeria. So that is, we’re at the very beginning stages of education. When
Dumisani took this to some major conventions he found people very reluctant, particularly
African-Americans, reluctant to act because they felt like they didn’t want to criticize African
leaders, and it wasn’t their place to do that. So we are grappling with that as one of the new
arenas in which we can operate.

KUMALO: I think the main thing we’re trying to point out to people is that repression is
repression. Whether it’s practiced by whites or blacks, it doesn’t matter. And you know the
realities are that in Nigeria you have a military regime that is denying 100 million Nigerian
people their rights that they won by going to the polls and electing a President, Mashood Abiola.
And you know, that President is in jail right now. And many of the journalists, church leaders
and other people have been jailed. Others like Ken Saro-Wiwa have been hanged, and you know, so
the Nigerian military regime is denying Nigerian people their rights. And that’s what we believe
is wrong. And it doesn’t matter that it’s a black government that’s doing it. It’s still wrong.
But it’s, that becomes a point where you have to explain to people because sometimes they think
we are being too hard on this government because it’s an African government. But I’m pleased to
say that when people learn about the repression that’s happening they stand up against it. And
there’s been general condemnation of Nigeria from African-Americans, from whites, from everybody
else. But information is key, because people really do not know. And until you come to them and
say, this is really what the issue is, then it makes a difference.

Let me give you a very quick case in point. The military regime held an election early this
winter for local government in Nigeria. And what they were going to do was put up big pictures of
the candidate; in fact they did this. They put up big pictures of the candidates chosen by the
military, not by the people. And people had to line up in front of these pictures and thereby
declare who they were going to vote for, and vote. And this was supposed to be democracy. So all
we did was, we went to the people and said, “If you on November 5 had to line up in front of
a picture of Dole or Clinton you wouldn’t go to the polls, right? It’s good that you go behind
the curtain and make whatever choice you make.” And then it resonates. They say, “Look,
yes, this is unfair, what is Washington doing about it?” And then they put pressure on
Washington. But each time we give them information it’s because we hope that they will use the
levers that they have. And the lever we have is the U.S. Congress, is the administration, and
it’s the state and local governments and instruments that we have to apply pressure for change to
come about.

DAVIDSON: Jennifer Davis says the American people are beginning to respond to Nigeria’s
crisis. A year ago New York City became the first American city to adopt a resolution condemning
Nigeria’s military regime and calling for economic sanctions. Since then Oakland, St. Louis, and
New Orleans have done the same, and the American Committee on Africa is now working on Boston and
Washington, D.C.

On the east side of the African continent sits Sudan. It’s the largest country
in Africa, and it suffers from civil war and chronic political instability. In 1989 an Army coup
installed a military Islamic fundamentalist regime. Dumisani Kumalo says the American Committee
on Africa faces a couple of problems in publicizing Sudan’s plight.

KUMALO: It’s hard to get accurate information about what’s happening there. We don’t sit
down here and dream up positions and say, “Okay, this is what Sudan should do. We’ll go out
and…” We take what the people inside whatever particular country are doing to struggle,
and bring it up to the people and say, “This is what’s happening.” Unfortunately, in
the Sudan it’s very hard to get information. And you hear about what’s happening in the south of
the country. Then you hear about what’s happening in the north. So there isn’t any information.
And it’s true of Mauritania, Gambia, and other places where there’s trouble. And so it makes it
harder to do that.

DAVIS: I would also say that there are small core groups of people who do work around,
particularly there’s a very good group working on Sudan. And then part of the reason that we
don’t do campaigns on everything is just that, you know, there are eight of us. We really have to
make some choices. And so I believe if we really put our minds to it, it’s not impossible, I
guess what I’m saying is I don’t think we should allow ourselves off the hook because we say it’s
too difficult to get information. We really are confronted with the problem that there’s very
little money to do work on U.S.-Africa policy. And we have always to make these very difficult
choices. So we would like to be able to impact more broadly. And the U.S. is a very powerful
country with a lot of impact everywhere. I believe we could do more if we had more resources.

DAVIDSON: We’ll pause here for a short break. You’re listening to Common Ground, a
service of the Stanley Foundation. Our guests are Jennifer Davis and Dumisani Kumalo of the
American Committee on Africa and the Africa Fund, two New York City-based organizations that
lobby and educate Americans on African issues.

The Stanley Foundation is a nonprofit, non-partisan organization that conducts
a wide range of programs meant to provoke thought and encourage dialogue on world affairs.
Printed transcripts and audio cassettes are available of this Common Ground program, and
at the end of the broadcast I’ll give you details on how to order.

Just as they have in the American civil rights movement, churches play a key part in the American
Committee on Africa’s strategy. It created a religious action network during the struggle to end
apartheid. The national interfaith network continues working today to support African
development, democracy and human rights, says Dumisani Kumalo

KUMALO: Well, the Religious Action Network is a very, very key part of the work we do in
that it brings together about 200 congregations that are sort of loosely affiliated in this
network. And some are more active than others and have committed themselves to doing work on
Africa. And these are congregations that also have ties—because of their denominations—the
national parties have an Africa office. And other people, the Methodists and the Anglicans and
the Lutherans. So they have a history denominationally of doing work on Africa. But what the
Religious Action Network does, it connects these congregations into unifying, into taking issues.
For instance, I’ve been on delegations with powerful church leaders and others who have gone to
Washington and met with people in the administration and said, “We care about what’s
happening in Africa.” So they bring a moral currency to this whole thing. And so they are
the ones who come in and say, “We care about this.” And the other thing, the value of
it is that it’s been Protestant, Catholic, and we’ve also had issues where we’ve been joined by
Jewish congregations on other issues. And it’s unique in that it brings people of faith, on a
particular issue, when there’s an issue that they focus on, they come together and say, “We
care about this issue a lot.” And they bring it to the people in the pews who normally don’t
read the papers and probably don’t even have time in their busy lives to worry too much about
Africa, but for that particular service they get a taste of what’s happening somewhere around the
world. So it’s a very, very important part of our work in that sense.

DAVIS: It underscores our belief that U.S. foreign policy shouldn’t all be made in
Washington. That it really should be made by an informed population. And that people are willing
to be informed. But a lot of their media fails them in informing them. And we’ve found that even
major media covers Africa terribly badly. And so it’s often very difficult for people to know how
they should act or what they should ask their representatives to do. But fundamentally we believe
it’s an informed population that will have, will lead to, good government policy or bad
government policy.

DAVIDSON: It is an uphill battle according to Jennifer Davis, just to maintain current
levels of U.S. aid to Africa. Last year the American Committee on Africa sent out several action
alerts to inform its network on threats to U.S. aid to Africa, which it says was cut by 20% in
1995. Davis also decried the U.S. Congress’s elimination of the Development Fund for Africa last
year. The Development Fund was created in 1987 to help the poor majority of Africans in long-term
development. Davis sees a number of factors that contribute to Africa’s low status in American
foreign policy.

DAVIS: I suppose one could say it’s far away; one could say it’s, there’s an element of
racism in it. Africa featured more centrally during the Cold War era because it was seen as an
important terrain. Now it isn’t seen as an important terrain, partly because the focus has gone
off, to some extent, the arena of raw materials. And people don’t worry very much because there’s
no competition in their view—the policymakers—for the raw materials anywhere. So, there’s, I
think, because foreign policy is often made on these very narrow basis of perceived
self-interest, whereas we see Africa as an enormously important continent. It’s linked by
history, by the fact that many Americans come originally from Africa, but it’s also linked by the
fact that it’s a sixth or something of the world’s population. I always think about that picture
we saw taken from outer space of our fragile world. You can’t disconnect people in one part of
the world from another part of the world. We’re all responsible for one another. Not like this
“global village,” because I believe it’s too simplistic. But we are all interconnected.
And so I think it’s enormously important for people to see the connections with Africa and to
interact with people in Africa. There’s an enormous wisdom in Africa. There are very interesting
social experiments being carried out. None of this normally hits the media because it’s not big
enough, and death and disaster anyway seem always to be more popular than small attempts at
progress. So I think it’s a serious fault. And I don’t think Africa is the only major foreign
arena that doesn’t hit the news. People know very little about even what’s to the north and to
the south of them. So unfortunately I think Americans do tend to be, perhaps because this is such
a powerful country, too focused on what is happening internally and unaware of the connections to
the rest of the world.

KUMALO: I think it’s, Americans don’t realize how much Africa matters. Africa does
matter. And I always remember when we were doing divestment, you’d get all these people who’d
come and say, “Oh, you know, you can’t divest from South Africa because we get all these
minerals that are key to us. Our planes wouldn’t fly without African minerals, we wouldn’t have
chrome.” So they had all these reasons why Africa was so valuable. And I just think the
problem is that Americans don’t realize how valuable Africa is to our every day life. There are
thousands of people who owe their jobs in this country because of trade between the United States
and Africa. But they don’t know that. And you know, we all know how much we owe our jobs to trade
with China, we all know how much we owe our jobs to trade with Japan, and Germany, and others,
but they just don’t realize how much they owe their jobs to trade with Africa. And that’s a
challenge for us, I guess, to be able to educate people that there’s a lot that you can value
about Africa. And that’s been the hardest story to tell. But people tend to do it themselves. I
know in Alabama, for instance, that when we met with the Governor we brought three women
legislators from southern Africa. And one of the states they visited was Alabama, and they met
with the Governor of Alabama. He was talking about how much of Alabama companies were doing trade
with Africa. So there’s beginning to be an awareness. People are becoming slowly aware that there
is this trade that nobody talks about, between individual states and maybe some other places with
Africa. So that’s the untold story which I think we will begin to hear lots and lots about as
time goes on.

DAVIDSON: One might wonder whether a powerful African-American lobby could really focus
American attention on Africa. But Jennifer Davis and Dumisani Kumalo say U.S. policy toward
Africa goes beyond the interests of just African-Americans.

DAVIS: It’s certainly true that historically African-American intervention and policy
around Africa, particularly South Africa is probably the best example, played a very important
role. When we were struggling to get sanctions imposed on apartheid South Africa, originally we
couldn’t get any legislation through the federal, through Congress in Washington. So Dumisani
began this campaign of working at state levels, and we got, I think, 30 states to pass
legislation. And he always stresses that it was always a combination of African-American and
other voters, Republican and Democratic legislators. You have to make coalitions. So I think that
the African-American voice was very critical, but it wasn’t the only one. And so I think of it in
terms of key stimuli, not really the only force. And I think the African-American voice has
always been very important.

KUMALO: I mean I think, sure, it’s obvious that African-Americans would care more about
Africa because that’s where we all come from. But I hope we are not going to arrive at that
situation where Africa should just be for black folks. It really takes everyone. When, look, I am
a black South African and living in the United States. I want to see peace in Israel. I don’t
say, “I’m not Jewish so I shouldn’t worry about peace in Israel.” I want to see peace
in Bosnia. It’s white folks in Bosnia who are killing each other. But I care because they are
there. And so I would hope people would care about Africa because this is a continent that
matters. Africa does matter. And we don’t want to see young babies in Africa not having medical
supplies, just as much as we don’t want to see young babies in Flatbush where I live not having
medical supplies. My desire, my dream, is that Americans, irrespective of race, culture or
religion, or whatever, would care about Africa. Because, simply, Africa matters. And they would
care about any other place in the world, because it simply matters. And of course we of African
descent will care more because to us it’s family. But it doesn’t absolve anybody to say,
“Well, it’s not my family.” Because we are all part of the same global experience. So
we all have to get together.

DAVIDSON: Dumisani Kumalo is Projects Director for the Africa Fund and its parent
organization, the American Committee on Africa. And Jennifer Davis is Executive Director of the
two organizations. For Common Ground, I’m Mary Gray Davidson.

Cassettes and transcripts of this program are available. The transcripts are free of charge and
the cassettes cost $5.00. To order a tape or transcript, or if you’d like to share your thoughts
about the program, you can write to us at the Stanley Foundation, 216 Sycamore Street, Suite 500,
Muscatine, Iowa. The zip code is 52761. Be sure to refer to Program No. 9705. That’s Program No.
9705. To order by credit card you can call us at 319-264-1500. That’s area code 319-264-1500.
And again, cassettes are $5.00 and transcripts are free of charge. Our e-mail address is [email protected].

Our theme music was created at B.J. Leiderman. Common Ground was produced and funded by
the Stanley Foundation.





Copyright © 1997,
The Stanley Foundation


[email protected]