Nuclear Weapons | Analysis and New Insights
The IAEA and Nuclear Security: Trends and ProspectsDownload
Despite nuclear security having emerged at the top of the international security agenda, and even with the worldwide interest in developing nuclear power capabilities, the standards for preventing, detecting, and responding to nuclear terrorist activities remain quite poorly defined. National capabilities for strengthening nuclear security are uneven, as is the political will for making those improvements.
There is now a plethora of overlapping tools and instruments—some legally binding, others purely voluntary, and some unilateral, others multilateral—to deal with the burgeoning problems of nuclear security and terrorist threats. Yet there is no single coordinating body for the nuclear security agenda. Greater coordination, direction, and clarity of the task ahead are needed. In a new policy analysis brief from the Stanley Center, Jack Boureston and Andrew Semmel argue that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)—because of its established track record, its programs already in practice, its independence, integrity, and confidentiality—is best suited to take that leadership role. Making that a reality, however, will not be easy.
Nuclear WeaponsNuclear Security Checklist Results Demonstrating Implementation of IAEA Information Circular 869
Nuclear WeaponsInternational Nuclear Security Peer Reviews: Making the IAEA IPPAS General and Sustainable
Nuclear WeaponsSafeguard the World’s Nuclear Arsenals
December 7, 2016NSGEG Report Launch and Press Briefing
December 7, 2016NSGEG Reception
December 6, 2016The Outlook for Strengthening Nuclear Security